Given that we're less than five days away from Opening Day, when birds sing, beer flows freely, and manna falls from the Heavens, I thought it might be a good idea to discuss the Yankees' upcoming schedule, some predictions for the American League, and whatever else fires out of my hands tonight. As I mentioned briefly in the previous post, the Yankees would serve themselves well with a quick start to the season, not only because it's always the right way to begin any season, but also because from the end of April through the first week of June, the Yankees will face a stretch of tough teams that will go far in telling us what kind of team the 2007 Yankees will be. Broken down briefly, April starts with with the home-stand against the Devil Rays and Orioles, then shifts to the road and Minnesota and Oakland (the first of four West Coast trips in 2007). After a day off, the Bombers return home for three games against Cleveland, then hit the road again for a weekend series with Boston (for which I'll assemble my ten--or more--favorite moments in the Yankees-Red Sox rivalry), then two-game series against Tampa Bay and at home against Toronto, with three to end the month against Boston.
Before assessing May, I have to say that I find the day off between the opener and the second game of the series (Wednesday) to be nothing short of idiotic. Is there a scheduling conflict with a Papal visit that I overlooked? Is Billy Joel playing the Stadium? WHY THE STINKING DAY OFF?!? Also, even though I cannot stand the two-game series, at least one in April is done right. Since Tampa is a dome team, there is no chance of a rain out, ensuring the games will be played and spare the Yankees a scheduling juggling act later in the season. Let's hope the two against Toronto go off without a hitch. Although we couldn't have done better than we did in August against Boston (Boston Massacre III, an ***-kicking any which way you could wish it, which looks great and feels better when written) last year, needing to pile together games because of rain outs is a colossal pain to be avoided, especially when one stems from a pointless two-game series.
Again, the end of April through the first week of June could catapult the Yankees or leave them in an early-season scramble. After the home series against Boston, NY travels to Texas for three, then comes home for four against Seattle and three versus Texas. The Yankees immediately head to Seattle for the second of four West Coast swings, then stop on the way back in Chicago for three against the White Sox, then three against the Mets, which at least gets them in their own beds. Then Boston looms again, followed by the Angels, then on the road to Toronto to close May, then three more in Boston followed by four, again in Chicago, against the other Sox. Apparently they couldn't make the 1,000 mile trip to the East Coast in the few weeks between series...
In sum, from April 25 through June 7, 27 of the 40 games the Yankees will play will be against teams with records above .500 in 2006, with the other 13 against Texas and Seattle, teams just below .500 last year. No picnic, with 22 of the 40 on the road and a second early-season trip out West factored in. But that's a good stretch to keep our eyes on, a good barometer for the Yankees. If we could win at least 24 of those games, we'd stand to be in good shape. Of course, this assumes we have a good April, which I feel in my bones we will. The rest of June, while no cupcake, seems considerably easier on paper, with Pittsburgh, Arizona, the Mets again, Colorado then San Francisco in our third of four West Coast trips, then Oakland to end June.
I won't bore you with any more blow-by-blow listings of the rest of the schedule. I think I made my point.
I'm tremendously looking forward to Opening Day. My plan is to get the grill warmed up about 45 minutes before game time, and char broil some hot dogs and spicy jalapeno bratwursts, with a couple cold coldies for good measure. I'll need to peel off around the 6th inning to pick up the kids from school, but that won't deter me from a responsibly festive Opening Day. I'm hoping that The Sage takes off for Opening Day, since I'll be watching the game, like too many others here in the Heartland Midwest, alone.
I felt a strong lag from the Yankees' lackluster exit from the playoffs last year over the off season, but really started to get the itch for baseball about two months ago. While I'm sure the team won't relish all the trips West, or the other vagaries of this year's schedule, I actually enjoy the late night games when the Boys play out West. It coincides with the house settling down from the day, we're usually not traveling anywhere at that time, and the kids are soon off to bed, leaving me, the game, and a cold one or two for the late innings. GLG is usually along for the ride for the first couple innings of the late games, but gets to bed before it's too late--she's still young, but she always brings the good luck, hence the name, and she asks really smart questions and has good insights.
We need solid pitching from the starters and bullpen, we need health, and we need smart patient at-bats. The bats will no doubt be there, but there are too few people in the lineup willing to take the ball the other way. A-Rod, Giambi, and Posada, though terrific hitters historically or better, too often look to pull the ball, no doubt because they can and have done so often. But we need Jeter, Cano, Matsui, and even Damon, to set the tone and example to use the opposite field. The 1998 Yankees, the greatest team I've ever seen by a country mile, didn't beat teams with the home run even though they hit 207 of them. Tino lead the team with 28, while Bernie hit 26 after missing 34 games. They did it by extending teams with timely base hits and a seemingly endless cycle of walks, four more than last year's very patient team. That's just over four walks a game. They also did it with pitching and even though we lack the rotation depth that the historic 1998 team had, we should still be good enough to string together some quality starts. Health is always an issue, and obviously teams, including us, always have to deal with injuries. But last year injuries hit us hard, losing Matsui and Sheffield. Though Bernie and Melky filled in very well, better than many of us would have guessed, it's hard to imagine that a healthy Matsui and Sheffield wouldn't have done great.
Matsui seems an overlooked key to the season to me. In that devastating and dominant lineup, Matsui will likely hit 6th, between Giambi and Cano or Posada. He's good for 100 RBI, and has never needed to hit a lot of home runs for us to be effective. I can envision him hitting what he did in 2005 (23-116-.305), and being more than happy with that. He's really important to the bottom half of the lineup wearing other teams' pitchers out, and should get a lot of good looks with Cano behind him and Giambi in front. As Peter Gammons said at the beginning of last year, pitchers facing the Yankees better pitch great because the Yankees will absolutely kill mediocre pitching.
Good Pitching, Health, and Smart At-Bats, in that order, and we'll be just fine.
Peace.